|
The 24-hour City Visions of a vibrant, urbane city
that fuses together culture and commerce for all of
its inhabitants is at the heart of the 24-hour city
concept. There is certainly excitement over this night
and day city: a symbol of the triumph of the arts, of
an intelligence-based economy, and as a space of collaboration.
The after-dark urban playgrounds are unleashed by the
deregulation of the night-time leisure economy. The
urban night is a space of sensuous experience, a space
of specific pleasure and danger. And at the same time,
the world of work painfully toils into the dawn. At
the edge of culture and innovation, the 24-hour city
slays its old shadows.
But this picture 24-hour city is clearly out of focus.
Its health deteriorates as strategies of deregulation
permit the growth of a market-led destruction of diversity,
and produce a monoculture of licensed premises and fast-food
outlets that scratch away at the pleasures of the urban
night. There is certainly conflict between the exclusivity
of the night-time economy of youth culture and the dream
of the urbane 24-hour city.
The eyes on our street are glazed over with dissatisfaction.
Dissatisfaction over the disorder of aggressive hedonism
on the street and its effects on residential amenity.
Dissatisfaction about crime and the fear of crime. Dissatisfaction
that the most profound outward exclusionary effects
of this 24-hour urbanism are exacted upon those most
disempowered in society.
This meeting of the London Women and Planning Forum
aims to address the questions surrounding the 24-hour
city and ways of life within the city. It also has the
objective of creating a dialogue between academics and
practitioners working with the urban environment.
The seminar asks:
- What are the problems of the social, cultural and
industrial 24-hour urban economies, and what can be
done to address them?
- What does 24-hour city have to offer more than
a youth-dominated drink and drugs dance culture in
bars and clubs?
- How can the 24-hour city satisfy the social needs
and aspirations of women in local communities?
- What are the gendered safety implications of the
24-hour city?
- Why is the economic/social/cultural role of civic
entrepreneurs in the 24-hour city?
- How can local stakeholders speak out for the preservation
and promotion of diversity and residential and visitor
amenity?
- And what is the role of planning in the 24-hour
urban economy, especially around questions of municipal
regulation?
There will be three keynote addresses given by influential
women working with the London environment, followed
by interactive discussions between attendees and speakers.
Our three confirmed speakers are:
- Marion Roberts, University of Westminster
"Living the 24-hour city - 48 hours in the life
of Old Compton Street, Soho"
- Kimberley Paumier, Camden Council
"Managing the 24-hour economy"
- Harriet Wilkins, Women's Design Service
"Making safer places"
Marion Roberts (Central Cities Institute, University
of Westminster) begins the session by leading us through
48 hours in the life of Old Compton Street in Soho.
Roberts argues that Soho has provided Britain with its
first experiment in 24-hour city living. She discusses
how the originators of the 24-hour city concept encompassed
an objective of creating town and city centres that
are friendly to women and families. Her paper draws
on the findings from a Leverhulme Foundation research
project that she conducted during the summer of 2002
that captured video and sound recordings from the street.
Her research established who was in the street, what
was happening, and provides evidence for the assessment
of conflicting claims over its meaning. She argues that
the 24-hour city concept has been subverted away from
its original inclusive aims into creating spaces dominated
by a masculine drinking culture. She offers in her conclusion
suggestions for reclaiming and modifying the 24-hour
city concept.
Managing the 24-hour economy is the subject of Kimberley
Paumier's (Camden Council) presentation on her
work as Camden Town Manager. She addresses the problems
of managing a 24-hour economy. She identifies the conflict
between the demands of different users; the growth in
the leisure market and simultaneous reduction in retail
demand; the growth of a 24-hour market and increased
'vertical drinking' culture. She then discusses
the initiatives used to address these problems: Supplementary
Planning Guidance (SPG) for licensing/planning policy;
through policies that encourage a mix of uses and diversify
the evening economy; through crime and licensing initiatives;
and improved street environments. She then concludes
with some thoughts about partnership and the communication
interface with the local community.
Harriet Wilkins' (Women's Design Service)
talk will consider her policy development work on community
safety in relation to the 24-hour city. She is currently
working on a project called 'Making Safer Places'
which was conceived by a consortium of three organisations:
the Women's Design Service, Neighbourhood Initiatives
and Crime Concern. The project looks at three urban
centres: Manchester, Bristol and London, and her talk
will consider the experience of Black and minority ethnic
women, older women and disabled women in the 24-hour
city of London.
Seminar Timetable
- 1.30pm Registration
- 2.00pm Presentations and questions
- 3.30pm Afternoon tea
- 3.45pm Discussion groups
- 4.45pm Summation
< Return to list of seminars
|