|
This table shows estimates of the numbers covered and
the wages gained in the London living wage campaign
between 2005 and 2011 (updated 5 December).
Workplaces
(by sector) |
Date first employers complaint |
Numbers
(by 2011) |
Accumulated
Money** |
Homerton, Mile End, Royal London*, Whipps Cross
NHS
Kite Clinic Ltd |
2006
|
1000 (ft) |
£20,666,880 |
Barclays, HSBC, Deutsche Bank, Morgan Stanley,
Lehman Bros, Linklaters, PWC, KPMG, Macquarie, Morgan
Stanley, Normura, PWC, Prudential, RBS, Standard
Chartered
Bank of America, Credit Suisse,
Deloitte, Goldman Sachs, Sarasin, CCLA |
2005
|
1915 (ft) |
£20,654,993 |
| Barclays (London wide) |
2007 (mid yr) |
1000 (pt) |
£7,285,200 |
Bates Wells Braithwaite, Eversheds, Freshfields
Bruckaus Deringer, Lovells, Linklaters, Norton Rose,
Slaughter and May
Allen & Overy, Lovells |
2010 |
780 (ft) |
£2,878,762 |
Arena BLM, Argus Media, Aspen Oil, Clownfish Marketing,
Connect Public Affairs, R H Evans Architects, Renegade
Pictures, Rengen Energy, Richard Hywelevan Architecture
& Design Ltd, Stanton Williams, Thames McGurk
Ltd, Waterhouse
L’Oreal |
2010 |
58(pt) |
£172,318 |
QMUL (doubled nos in 2011)
LSE
SOAS
Birkbeck/LSHTM
UoL Union
Goldsmiths, IoE, LBS, UCL, UEL,
King’s |
2007 (mid yr)
|
432 (ft)
432 (pt)pt)
|
£4,692,661 |
| Bethnal Green Tech, City and Islington College |
2011 |
30 (pt) |
£51,948 |
ACEVO, Bernardos, Big Issue, BioRegional, Business
to Business Exhibitions Ltd, CAN Mezzanine , Children
of the Andes, Children’s Rights Alliance for
England, Climate Change Group, CPAG, CSSA, Crisis
UK, Ecologist, Execution Charitable Trust, FoE,
Food Commission, Forum For the Future Ltd, Free
Tibet Campaign, Greenpeace, Groundwork UK, Healthy
Living Centre, International Action Network on Small
Arms, IPPR, Islington Ecology Centre, Jobs Go Public
Ltd, Karmaram, Lifeline Project, MedicAlert Foundation,
NCVO, Oxford Research Group, Peace Direct, Quiet
Revolution, Rainforest Foundation, Rethink, Safer
World, SD3 Ltd, Sustainable Development Capital,
The Bromley by Bow Centre, The Ethical Property
Foundation, The Young Foundation, Tindelmanor, Trust
for London, UnLtd, Westway Development Trust, Zaccheaus
2000
Amnesty International UK, Ethical Property,
LVSC, Save the Children, Toynbee Hall, UNICEF UK |
2005
|
165 (pt)
|
£954,127 |
| Olympics* |
2007 |
500 (ft) |
£4,743,648 |
City Hall cleaning and catering (inc traf sq café)
London Fire Brigade
MPA, LDA, TfL |
2005 |
1247 (ft)
979 (pt)
|
£26,757,541 |
| Dept for Children, Families and Schools |
2008 (mid yr) |
30 |
£179,244 |
LB Lewisham
LB Tower Hamlets
LB Islington
LB Hackney |
2010
|
380 (ft)
1000 (pt)
|
£6,138,288 |
Norlington School, St Charles Sixth Form College
Our Lady’s Convent High School, Notre
Dame, Trinity, Hackney Free |
2009 |
30 (pt) |
£69,358 |
| Tate, St Lukes Centre |
2009
|
25 (pt)
|
£108,810 |
| House of Commons |
2010 (mid yr) |
100 (ft)
62 (pt) |
£615,794 |
| Lush |
2011 |
200 (pt) |
£173,160 |
| Total |
|
6354 (ft)
3987 (pt)
10,341 (total) |
£96,101,173 |
Old total 2010: 8,865 and £62,
681, 059
Source:
Author’s calculations
Note about the calculations: These figures
are calculated using the difference between the NMW
and LLW except for those working in Canary Wharf and
the City as research suggests that these workers were
already paid about £1 more than the LLW and in
these cases, half the difference has been used.
Full time workers are assumed to work 36 hours a week
for 52 weeks a year: 1872 hours a year (although many
do work long hours of overtime which are not included
here).
Half the workers in higher education
and half of those at TfL, all those at the London Fire
Brigade, the LDA and the MPA, those in the Third Sector,
those working in care for Lewisham (1000 workers), schools,
the Tate, St Lukes, the DCFS and those in Barclays (region)
are assumed to work 15 hours a week as the vast majority
are part-time: 780 hours a year. All those working at
Lush are calculated as part time for 2011.
The difference (or half difference) between the NMW
and the LLW is applied to each hour worked for each
worker for the years when the improvement in pays were
in place.
The differences between the annual rates of
the NMW and the LLW
| |
NMW* |
LLW** |
Difference |
Half Difference |
LLW w/o benefits |
| 2003 |
4.50 |
6.40 |
1.90 |
0.95 |
|
| 2004 |
4.85 |
6.50 |
1.65 |
0.83 |
|
| 2005 |
5.05 |
6.70 |
1.65 |
0.83 |
8.10 |
| 2006 |
5.35 |
7.05 |
1.70 |
0.85 |
9.00 |
| 2007 |
5.52 |
7.20 |
1.68 |
0.84 |
9.15 |
| 2008 |
5.73 |
7.45 |
1.72 |
0.86 |
9.60 |
| 2009 |
5.80 |
7.60 |
1.80 |
0.90 |
9.85 |
| 2010 |
5.93 |
7.85 |
1.92 |
0.96 |
10.15 |
| 2011 |
6.08 |
8.30 |
2.22 |
1.11 |
10.40 |
* set by the Government funded Low Pay
Commission (http://www.lowpay.gov.uk)
** calcuated by the GLA from 2005 (http://www.london.gov.uk/mayor/economic_unit/workstreams/living-wage.jsp)
* in relation to the Olympics, I have
used ODA data published in September 2010 indicating
that 82% of employment was compliant with Living Wage.
At that time, 6,243 were employed on the park - assuming
10% were in low wage positions equates to 624 workers
and 80% of these are assumed to have been getting the
LW (500 workers).
** the accumulated money is based on annual calculations
for the sector, depending upon compliance with the living
wage during that year
|
Home